{"schemaVersion":1,"pilotId":"ERP-BRC-2026-P002","targetWorkId":"BRC-2026-P002","status":"packet-ready","updated":"2026-08-13","participation":{"invitationsSent":0,"reviewersConsented":0,"reviewsSubmitted":0,"reviewsPublished":0,"fabricatedParticipationAllowed":false},"scope":{"ko":"진단 경계 밖 증상 창립 프로토콜 v0.1의 문제 설정·방법·근거 충실도·임상 안전성에 대한 공개 평가","en":"Public assessment of the problem framing, methods, source fidelity, and clinical safety of the founding protocol v0.1"},"dimensions":[{"id":"claim-support","label":{"ko":"주장 지지","en":"Claim support"},"prompt":{"ko":"문서의 실질적 주장이 현재 연결된 근거보다 강하지 않은가?","en":"Are substantive statements no stronger than the evidence currently connected to them?"}},{"id":"source-fidelity","label":{"ko":"출처 충실도","en":"Source fidelity"},"prompt":{"ko":"원전·번역·주석·현대 연구와 해석이 분리되고 passage까지 추적 가능한가?","en":"Are primary text, translation, commentary, modern research, and interpretation separated and traceable to passages?"}},{"id":"method-fitness","label":{"ko":"방법 적합성","en":"Method fitness"},"prompt":{"ko":"질문에 맞는 자료군·층화·측정·반증·분석 계획인가?","en":"Do sources, strata, measurements, falsification, and analysis fit the question?"}},{"id":"clinical-relevance","label":{"ko":"임상 관련성","en":"Clinical relevance"},"prompt":{"ko":"실제 진료 의사결정과 환자 중요 결과에 추가되는 가치가 검증 가능하게 표현됐는가?","en":"Is added value to real decisions and patient-important outcomes expressed in a testable way?"}},{"id":"safety","label":{"ko":"안전성","en":"Safety"},"prompt":{"ko":"놓친 질환, 진단 지연, 치료 대체, 위해와 escalation 경로가 충분히 다뤄졌는가?","en":"Are missed disease, diagnostic delay, treatment substitution, harms, and escalation routes adequately addressed?"}},{"id":"novelty","label":{"ko":"새로움","en":"Novelty"},"prompt":{"ko":"새로운 기여가 기존 용어의 재명명이나 과장된 통섭과 구분되는가?","en":"Is the contribution distinct from relabelling existing terms or overstated synthesis?"}}],"ratingScale":[{"value":"acceptable","label":{"ko":"현재 형태로 공개 토론 가능","en":"Suitable for public discussion as is"}},{"value":"minor-revision","label":{"ko":"경미한 수정 필요","en":"Minor revision needed"}},{"value":"major-revision","label":{"ko":"중대한 수정 필요","en":"Major revision needed"}},{"value":"not-assessable","label":{"ko":"근거 부족으로 평가 불가","en":"Not assessable with current evidence"}}],"roles":[{"id":"clinical","title":{"ko":"독립 임상의","en":"Independent clinician"},"eligibility":{"ko":"해당 증상군을 진료하지만 저자 조직과 직접 이해관계가 없는 면허 임상의","en":"Licensed clinician caring for relevant symptom groups without direct interests in the author organisation"},"questions":[{"ko":"이중 트랙이 놓친 질환을 방지하면서 증상·기능 돌봄을 지연하지 않는가?","en":"Does the dual-track approach guard against missed disease without delaying symptom and functional care?"},{"ko":"어떤 문장이 실제 진료 권고로 오해될 위험이 있는가?","en":"Which statements risk being misconstrued as clinical recommendations?"}]},{"id":"methods","title":{"ko":"방법론자","en":"Methodologist"},"eligibility":{"ko":"임상역학·측정·관찰연구·질적 연구 중 관련 전문성을 가진 독립 연구자","en":"Independent researcher with relevant expertise in clinical epidemiology, measurement, observational, or qualitative methods"},"questions":[{"ko":"기준모형 이후 추가가치와 외부 검증 계획이 식별 가능한가?","en":"Are incremental value beyond baseline models and external validation identifiable?"},{"ko":"탐색·확증, multiplicity, missingness, confounding의 경계가 충분한가?","en":"Are discovery/confirmation, multiplicity, missingness, and confounding handled adequately?"}]},{"id":"classical-source","title":{"ko":"원전·의사학 연구자","en":"Classical-source or medical-history scholar"},"eligibility":{"ko":"한문 원전·판본·주석 계보 또는 동아시아 의사학 연구 경험이 있는 독립 연구자","en":"Independent scholar experienced in classical Chinese medical texts, editions, commentary lineages, or East Asian medical history"},"questions":[{"ko":"원전과 현대 범주의 비대응성을 충분히 보존하는가?","en":"Does the protocol preserve non-equivalence between classical and modern categories?"},{"ko":"판본·권편·면·번역·주석을 검증하기 위한 최소 locator가 적절한가?","en":"Are minimum locators for edition, volume, page, translation, and commentary appropriate?"}]},{"id":"patient-perspective","title":{"ko":"환자·생활경험 관점","en":"Patient or lived-experience perspective"},"eligibility":{"ko":"관련 경험을 가진 당사자 또는 독립 환자참여 연구자; 개인 의료정보 공개 불필요","en":"Person with relevant lived experience or independent patient-involvement researcher; no personal medical disclosure required"},"questions":[{"ko":"언어가 불신·심인성 환원·낙인을 강화하는가?","en":"Does the language reinforce disbelief, psychogenic reduction, or stigma?"},{"ko":"관찰 부담과 환자 중요 기능 목표가 실제 경험을 반영하는가?","en":"Do observation burden and patient-important functional goals reflect lived experience?"}]}],"requiredReviewerFields":["publicName","affiliationOrIndependentStatus","role","expertiseStatement","conflictStatement","publicReviewConsent","reviewText","dimensionRatings"],"publicationConsent":{"identityPublic":true,"reviewTextPublic":true,"conflictStatementPublic":true,"revisionHistoryPublic":true,"withdrawalDeletesRecord":false},"privacy":{"patientDataRequested":false,"personalMedicalDisclosureRequested":false,"contactDetailsPublished":false},"authorResponseTemplate":{"fields":["responseId","reviewId","version","disposition","responseText","changeLocator","unresolvedReason"],"dispositions":["accepted","partly-accepted","rebutted","deferred","contested"]}}