Open access · Korean / English

A patient’s difficulties can remain even after a diagnosis is settled.

Some people have seen several specialties yet have not regained daily function; others experience symptoms that vary too much over time and context to be captured by a single test. Alongside continued attention to missed disease, we study lived changes and treatment responses more closely. We read East Asian medical texts and clinical records alongside contemporary research not to repeat inherited answers, but to ask better questions in care today.

Published writing · 3

Recent publications

3 publications are currently available, including research protocols and working papers under open assessment.

working-paperBRC-2026-W0012026-08-13

The Back Burns and the Hands Feel Cold: Reconstructing Cold–Heat from a Single Score into a Spatiotemporal Phenotype

When one person reports heat in the back and a deep chill in the hands at the same time, placing the experience on a single “cold or heat” axis erases its most clinically informative features: distribution and simultaneity. Replacing that experience with one thermographic image erases sensory coding, temporal delay, adaptation, and context. This problem-led critical synthesis reads Korean-medicine cold–heat questionnaires; Korean and Japanese work on cold hypersensitivity; thermosensory physiology; quantitative sensory testing; vascular provocation; objective–subjective discordance in hot flushes; neuropathic burning; and the regional, depth, and temporal distinctions preserved in the Donguibogam. Three recurrent reductions emerge: spatial reduction of whole-body cold–heat into a sum score; temporal reduction of a fluctuating event to resting skin temperature; and criterion circularity when groups defined by expert judgment or self-report are reclassified using closely related questions or images. We propose a “local thermal field” that records, for location l and time t, perceived quality and intensity P(l,t), skin temperature and its rate of change T(l,t), cold and warm detection Q(l,t), perfusion and rewarming V(l,t), provoking and relieving context C(t), and functional effect F(t). This is not a new diagnosis but a measurement grammar for separating competing explanations. The first study should not train an AI to guess disease or test treatment effectiveness. It should combine cognitive interviews, 14-day event-based body maps, ambient temperature, and standardized rest–provocation–recovery observations to test repeatability, added information, and feasibility. The contribution of Korean-medicine observation is not to replace biomedical measurement, but to preserve experiences in which different regions move in different directions and to make any added prognostic, functional, or treatment-selection value falsifiable.

Yeonseung Choe · Baekrokdam Research Commons (BRC)localized thermal sensation · spatiotemporal phenotype · cold hypersensitivity of hands and feet · thermoception
protocolBRC-2026-P0022026-08-12

How Should Persistent Symptoms Not Fully Explained by Diagnosis Be Studied? A Protocol for Scope, Observational Language, and Dual-Track Safety

Some patients continue to experience symptoms and impaired daily function after receiving a diagnosis or completing multiple investigations. These experiences arise in different situations—including residual symptoms of established disease, an evolving differential diagnosis, functional syndromes, and changes after infection or treatment—and should not be collapsed into one cause or a new disorder. This protocol proposes a way to preserve those differences while observing features that diagnostic labels may miss: sequence of onset, symptoms that change together, daily context, loss of function, and response to treatment over time. Two paths remain active. One continues appropriate medical differential diagnosis and reassessment as symptoms, red flags, and trajectories change. The other records patient-important symptoms and function, treatment exposure, and harm without waiting for perfect diagnostic closure. Contemporary research and lived experience are read alongside East Asian primary texts, commentaries and cases, and Korean, Chinese, and Japanese clinical traditions without assuming that their concepts are equivalent. Whether Korean-medicine observations add value must be tested by asking if they improve reproducibility, prediction, or clinical decisions beyond diagnoses and standard measures alone. This is a research design, not a screening tool, treatment recommendation, or efficacy claim.

Yeonseung Choe · Baekrokdam Research Commons (BRC)persistent physical symptoms · diagnostic uncertainty · multisystem symptoms · longitudinal phenotyping
protocolBRC-2026-P0012026-08-12

Allostasis and Korean Medicine Revisited: A Protocol for Mapping Concepts, Measurement, and Translational Hypotheses

This protocol re-examines claims advanced in the 2012 series “Allostasis and Korean Medicine” using contemporary conceptual scholarship, biomedical literature, classical Korean-medicine sources, and counter-evidence. It does not equate Korean-medicine concepts with allostasis; instead, it distinguishes analogy, operational correspondence, mechanistic bridges, and testable translational hypotheses. Only public literature is used, and no treatment recommendation or patient-level conclusion is produced.

Yeonseung Choe · Baekrokdam Research Commons (BRC)allostasis · allostatic load · Korean medicine · evidence map

Collections

Research collections

Research from local practice

Localized Thermal Sensations and Thermoception

This programme studies localized heat and cold complaints—such as a burning back, strangely cold hands, or hot palms and soles—by separating sensation, skin temperature, vascular response, and lived context.

Founding programme

Symptoms Beyond Diagnostic Boundaries

The founding programme studies persistent, recurrent, multisystem, and time-varying symptoms without turning them into one new disorder, pairing continued diagnostic safety with active research into symptoms, function, and therapeutic possibilities.

Historical reappraisal

Allostasis and Korean Medicine: Reappraisal, 2012–2026

A historical reappraisal of a 2012 multidisciplinary thesis through conceptual history, measurement validity, domain evidence, and explicit counter-hypotheses. It is not the journal’s organising theory.

Research infrastructure

So readers can see where a claim came from

We distinguish editions, translations, and later interpretations, and show which sources support an important sentence and how far that support extends.

Research trail

The research trail behind the writing

These records show how ideas in the publications develop into questions, hypotheses, and study designs.

open-problemopenOP-2026-001

How can symptoms beyond diagnostic boundaries be observed and studied safely?

Some patients arrive with test results and diagnoses that may be correct, yet still feel that these do not fully explain what they are living through. This question is not an attempt to attach another disease label. It began from a clinical need: to keep looking for dangerous or evolving disease while also studying the sequence, covariation, and functional consequences of symptoms as legitimate medical information.

rationalepublishedRAT-2026-001

Why clinically important remainders persist after disease-centred classification

Diagnosis remains indispensable for treatment and safety. In practice, however, two people with the same diagnosis may live through very different days, and similar symptom lists may worsen under different conditions. This record does not weaken diagnosis; it explains why time, function, and context deserve study when a diagnostic label does not encode them well.

conjectureopenCON-2026-001

Conjecture of added clinical value from temporal, contextual, symptom-network phenotypes

When symptoms are recorded only as item scores, their order of onset and the way they move together disappear. I suspect that these relations and sequences may sometimes inform the next clinical decision better than a total score. This remains a hypothesis generated by clinical experience and must be tested against decisions based on standard measures alone.

How to read our work

Research readers can judge for themselves

The article is written for people; sources, versions, and review records are also available in structured forms that researchers and agents can inspect.

Follow a claim back to its source

Important judgments link to the source and relevant passage so readers can examine the context themselves.

Evidence that does not fit remains visible

We examine contrary findings, alternative explanations, and cases where an idea may not apply—not only material that supports it.

The Korean and English editions say the same thing

Both language editions are managed as one work and checked so translation does not strengthen or weaken the conclusion.

Immediate open access

Full text is available without registration or embargo, with machine-readable discovery, citation, and reuse formats.