awaiting-public-assessmentPRC-BRC-2026-P002External review: not-started

Public assessment record for the symptoms-beyond-diagnostic-boundaries protocol

How Should Persistent Symptoms Not Fully Explained by Diagnosis Be Studied? A Protocol for Scope, Observational Language, and Dual-Track Safety

Version history

  1. v0.1current2026-08-12

    First public protocol, formalising diagnostic openness and active symptom research as dual tracks.

    sha256:cf071857827e4010857999e5d04498b35ca9581e09d5935f7042e78139f88e66

Public assessments

editorial-preflightASM-2026-0012026-08-12

Baekrokdam research methods gate

Internal pre-publication check — not independent peer review

Independent: no · Operated by the same organisation as the author group.

DimensionRatingComment
publication-readinesspassProblem, safety boundaries, falsifiability, and bilingual alignment are structured for public discussion.
claim-supportnot-assessedThis is a protocol, not a result; scientific validity awaits external assessment.
source-fidelitychanges-requiredSubstantive statements are not yet fully connected to the passage ledger.
clinical-safetypassBoundaries prevent interpretation as a screening tool, treatment guideline, or data-collection approval.

Author responses

acceptedRSP-2026-001→ ASM-2026-001

Baekrokdam Research Commons (BRC)

The protocol will not be labelled validated or peer reviewed before passage coverage is complete; provenance gaps remain public.